nanog mailing list archives
Re: Multi site BGP Routing design
From: Chuck Anderson <cra () WPI EDU>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 20:48:39 -0400
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 07:40:15PM -0500, John.Herbert () ins com wrote:
This is a good concept but if the ISP route is a Juniper then as I recall by default it looks ahead, sees the as-path routing loop if it were to send it to the other router, and doesn't send it. So while you might be able to configure it on the receiving router, if the sending router won't send it, you're SOL.
True, the ISP in this case would have to cooperate :-)
Current thread:
- Re: Multi site BGP Routing design, (continued)
- Re: Multi site BGP Routing design Michael K. Smith (Jun 05)
- Re: Multi site BGP Routing design Steve Bertrand (Jun 05)
- RE: Multi site BGP Routing design Ivan Pepelnjak (Jun 06)
- Re: Multi site BGP Routing design Saqib Ilyas (Jun 06)
- Re: Multi site BGP Routing design Adam Greene (Jun 06)
- RE: Multi site BGP Routing design Justin Krejci (Jun 08)
- RE: Multi site BGP Routing design Ivan Pepelnjak (Jun 09)
- Re: Multi site BGP Routing design Michael K. Smith (Jun 05)
- Re: Multi site BGP Routing design Steve Bertrand (Jun 05)
- RE: Multi site BGP Routing design John.Herbert (Jun 05)
- Re: Multi site BGP Routing design Chuck Anderson (Jun 05)
- Re: Multi site BGP Routing design Steve Bertrand (Jun 05)
- Re: Multi site BGP Routing design Randy Bush (Jun 05)
- Re: Multi site BGP Routing design Steve Bertrand (Jun 05)
- Re: Multi site BGP Routing design Randy Bush (Jun 05)
- Re: Multi site BGP Routing design Randy Bush (Jun 05)