nanog mailing list archives

Re: Anomalies with AS13214 ?


From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:33:45 +0200

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:50:02AM +0100,
 Russell Heilling <chewtoy () s8n net> wrote 
 a message of 75 lines which said:

I guess ROBTEX didn't implement ingress filters after the last
episode...

It *seems* (I do not know them in detail) that Robtex
<http://www.robtex.com/>, AS 48285, is dedicated to measurements, not
to IP transit. If so, it makes sense for them to accept everything.

If I'm right, it means Cyclops was wrong to have a monitor in an AS
which is not a "real" operator.


Current thread: