nanog mailing list archives
Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:45:27 -0700
Matthew Huff wrote:
Just an FYI, I didn't hijack this thread, I'm the one that started it. If you look at the Subject line it says NMS for Server hardware / Application monitoring not for router/switch monitoring. Regardless, the suggestions and info is good for everyone, I just wanted to push a bit back towards the original topic.
Yeah, you did. You can't just hit reply and change the subject. That doesn't kill the thread references. I'm seeing this whole thing under "What is good in modular routers these days?" when a new message arrives in threaded view. It's actually kind of obnoxious when someone combines threads. ~Seth
Current thread:
- Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring, (continued)
- Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring Stefan (Jul 21)
- Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring Roland Dobbins (Jul 21)
- Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring Warren Kumari (Jul 22)
- Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring Jack Bates (Jul 22)
- Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring Eric Gauthier (Jul 22)
- Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring Will Clayton (Jul 22)
- RE: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring Matthew Huff (Jul 22)
- Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring Alex H. Ryu (Jul 22)
- Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring Jens Link (Jul 22)
- RE: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring Matthew Huff (Jul 22)
- Re: Opensource or Low Cost NMS for Server Hardware / Application Monitoring Seth Mattinen (Jul 22)