nanog mailing list archives
Re: What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router)
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:31:36 -0500
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 09:39:25AM -0400, R. Benjamin Kessler wrote:
There has been a lot of good feedback regarding the deficiencies of the 7600 platform... So, the new question is: what platforms should a small, start-up ISP consider when looking to provide Ethernet services to their customers? - Scalability - 100M, 1G, 10G access speeds (backplane limitations, number of ports per chassis, etc.) - MPLS Capabilities - QoS Features - Ease of configuration and support, etc. (finding NOC talent, scripting tools, etc.) - Software/Hardware "stability" and "longevity" (we don't want something that is brand-new and therefore "buggy" nor do we want something that is going EOL next year) - Bang for the buck (both acquisition and on-going maintenance and support)
People use the 6500/7600 platform because it is dirt cheap, it mostly works especially if you aren't doing anything too interesting or complex with it (and if you have to ask, you probably aren't), and there is an unlimited supply of "talent" (if you can call it that) who understands basic IOS. If you're really a small ISP looking for a safe bet, this is a fine choice. It's also available in quantity and for cheap on the used market, which is probably where you want to go as a small ISP. If on the other hand you're looking for a "good" platform and money is no object, the Juniper MX is the unquestioned leader in this space. Unfortunately it costs quite a bit more than a 6500/7600 (around 4x-10x more depending on how good a deal you get on one, and how bad a deal you get on the other), but you do get what you pay for. :) The other players in this space are the Foundry MLX/XMR and Force10. Each has their advantages and disadvantages compared to Cisco, and may be more appropriate for some people under some circumstances, but at the end of the day they are both terribly flawed products too just in different ways. Cisco still comes out with the significant price advantage though, especially on the used market, which means for "most" people who have to ask this type of question the 6500/7600 is the way to go. -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router., (continued)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Roland Dobbins (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Darren Bolding (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Roland Dobbins (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Roland Dobbins (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 18)
- Message not available
- What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router) R. Benjamin Kessler (Jul 22)
- Re: What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router) Jim Wininger (Jul 22)
- Re: What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router) Manu Chao (Jul 22)
- RE: What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router) R. Benjamin Kessler (Jul 22)
- Re: What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router) David Storandt (Jul 22)
- Re: What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router) Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 22)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Saku Ytti (Jul 18)