nanog mailing list archives
Re: What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router)
From: Manu Chao <linux.yahoo () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:29:24 +0200
Juniper M10i versus Cisco ASR 1000 On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Jim Wininger <jwininger () indianafiber net>wrote:
What do you consider a "small start-up ISP"? What kind of upstream connectivity are you considering (or at least falls under the category of small isp) bandwidht, bgp etc? On 7/22/09 9:39 AM, "R. Benjamin Kessler" <rbk () mnsginc com> wrote:There has been a lot of good feedback regarding the deficiencies of the 7600 platform... So, the new question is: what platforms should a small, start-up ISP consider when looking to provide Ethernet services to their customers? - Scalability - 100M, 1G, 10G access speeds (backplane limitations, number of ports per chassis, etc.) - MPLS Capabilities - QoS Features - Ease of configuration and support, etc. (finding NOC talent, scripting tools, etc.) - Software/Hardware "stability" and "longevity" (we don't want something that is brand-new and therefore "buggy" nor do we want something that is going EOL next year) - Bang for the buck (both acquisition and on-going maintenance and support) I'm sure I'm missing a lot of things...are there any good presentations from previous NANOG meetings that one should review? Thanks in advance, Ben-- Jim Wininger Indiana Fiber Network Desk - 317-777-7114 Cell - 317-432-7609 Office - 317-280-4636 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail transmission (including any attachment) is intended for the exclusive use of the named recipient and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, anyone other than the named recipient (or person authorized to deliver it to the named recipient). It should not be copied or forwarded to any unauthorized person. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system including any attachment without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by return e-mail.
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router., (continued)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Tony Varriale (Jul 20)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. deleskie (Jul 17)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Saku Ytti (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Roland Dobbins (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Darren Bolding (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Roland Dobbins (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Roland Dobbins (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 18)
- Message not available
- What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router) R. Benjamin Kessler (Jul 22)
- Re: What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router) Jim Wininger (Jul 22)
- Re: What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router) Manu Chao (Jul 22)
- RE: What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router) R. Benjamin Kessler (Jul 22)
- Re: What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router) David Storandt (Jul 22)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Saku Ytti (Jul 18)
- Re: What Platform for a small ISP (was: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router) Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 22)
- Re: Cisco 7600 (7609) as a core BGP router. Saku Ytti (Jul 18)