nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP Unbundling circuits
From: JC Dill <jcdill.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:35:37 -0800
Mark Kent wrote:
On a slightly related topic, a US-based colo outfit used by a company I work with wants a fee to disconnect power to the cage. The tenant had been there for years and, at contract renewal time, was lobbied hard ($$) by the colo company to reduce power consumption.
Did they mention a deinstall fee at this time?
The tenant worked for a few months and freed up 20 power circuits. The colo then said that they had a disconnect fee for each power circuit. Now, I think a reasonable fee is $0. The colo wants considerably more. I won't bias you with the figure yet... please let me know what you think is reasonable, either by experience or just as a thought exercise.
I think a reasonable fee is whatever is set in their contract - which I suspect is $0. You can't just tack on fees like this afterwards.
jc
Current thread:
- Re: ISP Unbundling circuits, (continued)
- Re: ISP Unbundling circuits Jay Nugent (Jan 29)
- Re: ISP Unbundling circuits Colin Alston (Jan 29)
- Re: ISP Unbundling circuits Etaoin Shrdlu (Jan 29)
- Re: ISP Unbundling circuits Wayne E. Bouchard (Jan 29)
- Re: ISP Unbundling circuits Seth Mattinen (Jan 29)
- Re: ISP Unbundling circuits Colin Alston (Jan 29)
- Re: ISP Unbundling circuits Michael Holstein (Jan 29)
- Re: ISP Unbundling circuits Bruce Robertson (Jan 29)
- Re: ISP Unbundling circuits Mark Kent (Jan 29)
- Re: ISP Unbundling circuits Wayne E. Bouchard (Jan 29)
- Re: ISP Unbundling circuits Chris Hills (Jan 30)
- Re: ISP Unbundling circuits JC Dill (Jan 29)
- Re: ISP Unbundling circuits Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 29)
- Re: ISP Unbundling circuits Wayne E. Bouchard (Jan 29)
- Re: ISP Unbundling circuits Jay Nugent (Jan 29)