nanog mailing list archives
Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:46:29 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Kevin.Smith () dca state fl us wrote:
Participting in a severe solar event EXERCISE. Can anyone give me an educated guesstimate of the percentage of backbone traffic that is satellite dependent vs. that which is totally land-based?
The last FCC statistics I found researching this last year. 2006 Satellites carry 0.22% of US international circuits. There are 14,346 US international circuits via satellite. <http://www.donelan.com/overseas.html>
Current thread:
- Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Kevin . Smith (Jan 06)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Simon Lockhart (Jan 06)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 06)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Paul Donner (Jan 06)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Sean Donelan (Jan 06)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Paul Donner (Jan 06)
- RE: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Frank Bulk (Jan 07)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Paul Donner (Jan 06)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Joel Jaeggli (Jan 06)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Joe Abley (Jan 07)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Marshall Eubanks (Jan 07)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Marshall Eubanks (Jan 07)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic sthaug (Jan 07)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Bill Stewart (Jan 07)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Bjørn Mork (Jan 08)
- Re: Estimate of satellite vs. Land-based traffic Marshall Eubanks (Jan 08)