nanog mailing list archives
Re: real hardware router VS linux router
From: Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:16:05 +1300
On 20/02/2009, at 9:51 PM, Bailey Stephen wrote:
Not sure if this has already been mentioned, but what about solid state hard drives? Think they are in the high GB capacity now and solves theproblem of no moving parts?
Regular CF works fine.CF's interface is ATA, so you can drop it in to a PATA hole with a very simple adapter.
There are plenty of "network appliance" boxes that are designed for this sort of thing with lots of network holes mounted on the front and so on. Lots of them have CF card slots on the front as well, just like many router vendors do.
-- Nathan Ward
Current thread:
- RE: real hardware router VS linux router, (continued)
- RE: real hardware router VS linux router Ray Burkholder (Feb 19)
- Re: real hardware router VS linux router Leen Besselink (Feb 20)
- Re: real hardware router VS linux router William Warren (Feb 19)
- Re: real hardware router VS linux router Leen Besselink (Feb 20)
- Re: real hardware router VS linux router Chris Adams (Feb 20)
- Re: real hardware router VS linux router Jack Bates (Feb 20)
- Re: real hardware router VS linux router Steve Bertrand (Feb 19)
- Re: real hardware router VS linux router mike (Feb 19)
- Re: real hardware router VS linux router Brandon Galbraith (Feb 19)
- RE: real hardware router VS linux router Bailey Stephen (Feb 20)
- Re: real hardware router VS linux router Nathan Ward (Feb 20)
- Re: real hardware router VS linux router William Hamilton (Feb 20)
- Re: real hardware router VS linux router Joe Greco (Feb 19)
- Re: real hardware router VS linux router Leen Besselink (Feb 21)
- Re: real hardware router VS linux router Adrian Chadd (Feb 21)
- Re: real hardware router VS linux router Nathan Ward (Feb 22)