nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Confusion
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:18:51 -1000
On Feb 17, 2009, at 7:40 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
Most of the time the vendors don't educate their sales force (both the droids and the sales engineers) about IPv6 because they themselves have made the strategic decision that IPv6 isn't important to them (personal view).
Suggestion: next time you buy equipment from competing vendors, tell the sales folk from the losing vendors that one deciding factor was (vendor or product) IPv6 support. That (and perhaps only that) will get their attention... :-)
If any CPE NAT box vendor comes around and has 6to4 with proper IPv6, I'll happily recommend all our customers who want IPv6 to buy that perticular box.
Apple Airport Extreme? (Seems to work, but I don't know how standards conformant it is)
Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 Confusion, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Steven Lisson (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion Skywing (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 17)
- RE: IPv6 Confusion TJ (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Jack Bates (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Nathan Ward (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Justin Shore (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Randy Bush (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Adrian Chadd (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 17)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Kevin Oberman (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Conrad (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Stephen Sprunk (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Jeff S Wheeler (Feb 18)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion David Freedman (Feb 19)
- Re: IPv6 Confusion Dave Pooser (Feb 18)