nanog mailing list archives
Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless
From: Dave Temkin <davet1 () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:29:01 -0800
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Exactly. I've seen this as well in both instances but haven't seen it on mobile phones. It's something so obscure that you're going to have to really want it to turn it on. I don't think the Port 25 example holds much water here.On Feb 10, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Dave Temkin wrote:Chuck Anderson wrote:Why must it be always "real" versus NAT? 99% of users don't care one way or another. Would it be so hard for the carrier to provide a switch between NAT and "real" IP if the user needs or wants it?On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:31:38PM +0100, Matthias Leisi wrote:Mark Andrews schrieb:OTOH, Verizon is not the only provider of smartphone connectivity in the world. Most of them try to be "good citizens" and do not waste a scarceI don't see any reason to complain based on those numbers. It's just a extremely high growth period due to technology change over bring in new functionality.resource (IPv4 space).I disagree that using global IPv4 space is a "waste". Every device deserves to have "real" internet connectivity and not this NAT crap.Lots of providers do. Sometimes the choice between static & dynamic is bundled with the choice between NAT & "real" on some broadband providers.I've also seen hotels do it, and even charge extra for it. (Yes, I paid. ;)
-Dave
Current thread:
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless, (continued)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Mike Leber (Feb 08)
- RE: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Holmes,David A (Feb 09)
- RE: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Skywing (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Martin Hannigan (Feb 09)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Matthias Leisi (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Chuck Anderson (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Dave Temkin (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Dave Temkin (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Scott Howard (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Paul Wall (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Paul Wall (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Christopher Morrow (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless James Hess (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Joel Jaeggli (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Joel Esler (Feb 08)