nanog mailing list archives
Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:57:49 -0500
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:52:52 PST, Dave Temkin said:
Why must it be always "real" versus NAT? 99% of users don't care one way or another. Would it be so hard for the carrier to provide a switch between NAT and "real" IP if the user needs or wants it?
You're almost always better off not providing a user-accessible switch. Especially not a shiny one labeled "Do not touch unless you know what you are doing". (FWIW, this is exactly the same issue as "block port 25 unless user requests opt-out from the block")
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless, (continued)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Aaron Glenn (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless David Conrad (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Mike Leber (Feb 08)
- RE: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Holmes,David A (Feb 09)
- RE: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Skywing (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Martin Hannigan (Feb 09)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Matthias Leisi (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Chuck Anderson (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Dave Temkin (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Dave Temkin (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Scott Howard (Feb 10)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Paul Wall (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Paul Wall (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless Christopher Morrow (Feb 08)
- Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless James Hess (Feb 08)