nanog mailing list archives
Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP
From: Andy Davidson <andy () nosignal org>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:46:05 +0000
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 01:13:14PM -0500, Joe Maimon wrote:
Perhaps ebgp-multihop with this ISP's upstream provider might offer you an advantage combined with this approach.
This is quite neat, but the ISP may be multihomed and support BGP at one edge (several transits, several peers), but not at their customer facing edge. Andy
Current thread:
- RE: One /22 Two ISP no BGP, (continued)
- RE: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Paul Stewart (Feb 13)
- RE: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Michael Smith (Feb 13)
- Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Seth Mattinen (Feb 13)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Charles Regan (Feb 13)
- Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Seth Mattinen (Feb 13)
- Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Francois Menard (Feb 14)
- Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Brandon Galbraith (Feb 14)
- Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Charles Regan (Feb 06)
- Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Jason Biel (Feb 06)
- Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Joe Maimon (Feb 06)
- Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Andy Davidson (Feb 09)
- Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Daniel Rogers (Feb 06)
- Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Steve Bertrand (Feb 06)
- Re: One /22 Two ISP no BGP Jason Biel (Feb 06)