nanog mailing list archives
Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
From: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy () druid net>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:20:25 -0500
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:03:57 +0100 (CET) sthaug () nethelp no wrote:
What reason could you possibly have to use non RFC 1918 space on a closed network? It's very bad practice - unfortunately I do see it done sometimes....There are sometimes good reasons to do this, for instance to ensure uniqueness in the face of mergers and acquisitions.
How does that help? If you are renumbering due to a merger, couldn't you just agree on separate private space just as easily? -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy () druid net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
Current thread:
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Trey Darley (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Paul Stewart (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space sthaug (Feb 02)
- Re: Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space mikelieman (Feb 02)
- RE: Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matlock, Kenneth L (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Colin Alston (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Chuck Anderson (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space sthaug (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Chris Meidinger (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space sthaug (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space sthaug (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Andre Sencioles Vitorio Oliveira (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Tico (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Måns Nilsson (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Feb 02)