nanog mailing list archives

Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space

From: sthaug () nethelp no
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:03:57 +0100 (CET)

What reason could you possibly have to use non RFC 1918 space on a
closed network?  It's very bad practice - unfortunately I do see it done
sometimes....


There are sometimes good reasons to do this, for instance to ensure
uniqueness in the face of mergers and acquisitions.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug () nethelp no

Current thread:

Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Trey Darley (Feb 02)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 02)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Paul Stewart (Feb 02)
  - Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space sthaug (Feb 02)
    - Re: Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space mikelieman (Feb 02)
    - RE: Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matlock, Kenneth L (Feb 02)
    - Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Colin Alston (Feb 02)
    - Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Chuck Anderson (Feb 02)
    - Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Feb 02)
    - Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 02)
    - Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Chris Meidinger (Feb 02)
    - Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Feb 02)
    - Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space sthaug (Feb 02)
    - Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Feb 02)

(Thread continues...)