nanog mailing list archives
Re: ip-precedence for management traffic
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:55:57 -0500
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:19:32PM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote: [snip]
Apparently I forgot the <rant> tag, but really, if you have sane CoPP policies, you are mostly protected. If the vendor does not provide this capability, please STOP BUYING THEIR CRAP.
Another fine example of broken fate-sharing when management plane (executives with purse strings) is strictly segmented from control plane (engineers and operators). -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
Current thread:
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic, (continued)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic tvest (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Alexander Harrowell (Dec 30)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Greco (Dec 29)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Greco (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Nick Hilliard (Dec 29)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic TJ (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Greco (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Jared Mauch (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Andy Davidson (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Provo (Dec 30)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic David Conrad (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Randy Bush (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Michael Thomas (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Jared Mauch (Dec 29)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Dorn Hetzel (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Paul Ferguson (Dec 31)