nanog mailing list archives
Re: ip-precedence for management traffic
From: Andy Davidson <andy () nosignal org>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:54:16 +0000
On 29 Dec 2009, at 17:19, Jared Mauch wrote:
I've watched BCPs be diluted at various companies due to market pressures. $major_provider did not require me to register my routes, why should I have to do that in order to give you $X MRC for the next 12-24-36 months?
[...]
Honestly, I wish we could have a "better" network. One where we have mutually agreed "I will filter my customers if you do".
You can (should) still filter their prefixes - the customer get added pain because changes have to be done by hand, through tickets, maybe as a billable incident. :-) Andy
Current thread:
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic, (continued)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Randy Bush (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic tvest (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Alexander Harrowell (Dec 30)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Greco (Dec 29)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Greco (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Nick Hilliard (Dec 29)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic TJ (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Greco (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Jared Mauch (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Andy Davidson (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Provo (Dec 30)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic David Conrad (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Randy Bush (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Michael Thomas (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Jared Mauch (Dec 29)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Dorn Hetzel (Dec 29)