nanog mailing list archives
Re: ip-precedence for management traffic
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:07:40 +0000
On Dec 29, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Luca Tosolini wrote:
this leaves out only ipp 7 for management traffic, on the premise that routing and management should not share the same queue and resources.....
Management-plane traffic should be sent/received via your DCN/OOB network, so that it's not competing with customer traffic nor subject to network partitions or other disruptive events. It should not be co-mingled with traffic on the production network. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Injustice is relatively easy to bear; what stings is justice. -- H.L. Mencken
Current thread:
- ip-precedence for management traffic Luca Tosolini (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Dobbins, Roland (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Mehmet Akcin (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Julio Arruda (Dec 29)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Steven Bellovin (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Christopher Morrow (Dec 29)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Greco (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 29)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Mehmet Akcin (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Dobbins, Roland (Dec 29)