nanog mailing list archives
ip-precedence for management traffic
From: Luca Tosolini <bit.gossip () chello nl>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:02:10 +0100
Experts, what is the general opinion of using ipp 7 'network control' for management traffic like: telnet ssh snmp ..... The idea is that ipp 0 1 2 3 4 5 are used for user traffic ipp = 6 is used by default by routing protocols like BGP, OSPF, LDP ... this leaves out only ipp 7 for management traffic, on the premise that routing and management should not share the same queue and resources..... Thanks, Luca.
Current thread:
- ip-precedence for management traffic Luca Tosolini (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Dobbins, Roland (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Mehmet Akcin (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Julio Arruda (Dec 29)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Steven Bellovin (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Christopher Morrow (Dec 29)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Greco (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 29)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Mehmet Akcin (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Dobbins, Roland (Dec 29)