nanog mailing list archives
Re: Routing to multiple uplinks
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:10:15 -0500
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:46:42 EST, rodrick brown said:
The applicatiOn running on these hosts must only see/use one target address this needs to be transparent as possible. NIC bonding/teaming on the host side isn't a viable solution because of the latency overhead same goes for vrrp/hsrp.
If you're worried about the latency issues with NIC bonding, what do you intend to do about the speed-of-light latency from Chicago to NYC?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Routing to multiple uplinks rodrick brown (Dec 18)
- Re: Routing to multiple uplinks Peter Hicks (Dec 18)
- Re: Routing to multiple uplinks Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 18)
- RE: Routing to multiple uplinks Scott Berkman (Dec 19)
- Re: Routing to multiple uplinks Steven King (Dec 19)
- Re: Routing to multiple uplinks Rodrick Brown (Dec 19)
- Re: Routing to multiple uplinks Steven King (Dec 19)
- RE: Routing to multiple uplinks Deepak Jain (Dec 20)
- RE: Routing to multiple uplinks Ivan Pepelnjak (Dec 20)
- Re: Routing to multiple uplinks Steven King (Dec 19)