nanog mailing list archives
Re: Routing to multiple uplinks
From: Peter Hicks <peter.hicks () poggs co uk>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:55:18 +0000
rodrick brown wrote:
This may be slightly off topic however I have a very unique situation where I need to provide two diverse paths to a major stock exchange. Each host may either use route A or B for any given reason to access this particular exchange using two distinct routers and target address.
Have you considered point-to-point circuits?
The applicatiOn running on these hosts must only see/use one target address this needs to be transparent as possible. NIC bonding/teaming on the host side isn't a viable solution because of the latency overhead same goes for vrrp/hsrp.
What latency do you mean when you talk about NIC bonding and VRRP? Peter
Current thread:
- Routing to multiple uplinks rodrick brown (Dec 18)
- Re: Routing to multiple uplinks Peter Hicks (Dec 18)
- Re: Routing to multiple uplinks Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 18)
- RE: Routing to multiple uplinks Scott Berkman (Dec 19)
- Re: Routing to multiple uplinks Steven King (Dec 19)
- Re: Routing to multiple uplinks Rodrick Brown (Dec 19)
- Re: Routing to multiple uplinks Steven King (Dec 19)
- RE: Routing to multiple uplinks Deepak Jain (Dec 20)
- RE: Routing to multiple uplinks Ivan Pepelnjak (Dec 20)
- Re: Routing to multiple uplinks Steven King (Dec 19)