nanog mailing list archives
Re: Chinese bgp metering story
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:37:21 +0000
On Dec 19, 2009, at 2:24 AM, Jonny Martin wrote:
Mixing billing with the reachability information signalled through BGP just doesn't seem like a good idea.
This is done all the time via combinatorial BGP/NetFlow analysis, for peering/transit analysis reports, offnet/on-net billing differentials, etc. The merits (or lack thereof) of the 'proposal' in question aside, there's nothing evil or stupid about doing this on one's own network. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Injustice is relatively easy to bear; what stings is justice. -- H.L. Mencken
Current thread:
- Chinese bgp metering story Joly MacFie (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Bill Woodcock (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Steven Bellovin (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Fred Baker (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Steven Bellovin (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Jonny Martin (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Marshall Eubanks (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Dobbins, Roland (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story James Hess (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Dobbins, Roland (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Adrian Chadd (Dec 19)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Paolo Lucente (Dec 19)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Randy Bush (Dec 19)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Dobbins, Roland (Dec 19)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Paolo Lucente (Dec 19)
- RE: Chinese bgp metering story Leigh Porter (Dec 20)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Randy Bush (Dec 20)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Steven Bellovin (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Bill Woodcock (Dec 18)
- Re: Chinese bgp metering story Joel Jaeggli (Dec 19)