nanog mailing list archives
Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers
From: Patrick Muldoon <doon.bulk () inoc net>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:22:14 -0500
On Dec 9, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Mike Lieman wrote:
Is there an RFC detailing that specific text strings must be used for static v. dynamic addresses?
Well there is this draft Document, FWIW, http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-msullivan-dnsop-generic-naming-schemes-00.txt Which contains suggestions.. -Patrick -- Patrick Muldoon Network/Software Engineer INOC (http://www.inoc.net) PGPKEY (http://www.inoc.net/~doon) Key ID: 0x370D752C Please send all spam to my main address, root@localhost
Current thread:
- Arrogant RBL list maintainers Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Dec 09)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers William Herrin (Dec 09)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Mike Lieman (Dec 09)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Patrick Muldoon (Dec 09)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Seth Mattinen (Dec 09)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Jon Lewis (Dec 09)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Christopher Morrow (Dec 09)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Mike Lieman (Dec 09)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Michael Holstein (Dec 09)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Seth Mattinen (Dec 09)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Michael Holstein (Dec 09)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Seth Mattinen (Dec 09)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Ken Chase (Dec 09)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 09)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Michael Holstein (Dec 09)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers Seth Mattinen (Dec 09)
- Re: Arrogant RBL list maintainers William Herrin (Dec 09)