nanog mailing list archives
Re: Linux shaping packet loss
From: sthaug () nethelp no
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:13:42 +0100 (CET)
The biggest problem with duplex had to do with 100mb. Cisco (and a lot of other companies) decided in their infinite wisdom that at 100mb if auto-negotiation fails, to use half duplex as the default.
No, that wasn't those companies deciding to do so in their infinite wisdom. That was those companies deciding to follow the IEEE standard! Cisco and others may be to blame for a lot of things, but not this one. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug () nethelp no
Current thread:
- Linux shaping packet loss Chris (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Bret Clark (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss sthaug (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Joe Abley (Dec 08)
- RE: Linux shaping packet loss Matlock, Kenneth L (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss sthaug (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Scott Howard (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Tony Finch (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Nathan Ward (Dec 08)
- RE: Linux shaping packet loss Keith Medcalf (Dec 10)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss sthaug (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Brielle Bruns (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Michael Holstein (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Bret Clark (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Chris (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Simon Horman (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss gordon b slater (Dec 08)
- Re: Linux shaping packet loss Bazy (Dec 08)