nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS alternatives (was Re: Dan Kaminsky)
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 22:24:56 +0700
On Aug 5, 2009, at 10:11 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
For all it's short comings the DNS and the single namespace it brings is much better thanhaving a multitude of namespaces.
I agree with you, but I don't think this approach is going to persist as the standard model.
Increasingly, transport and what we now call layer-7 are going to become conflated (we already see all these Rube Goldberg-type mechanisms to try and accomplish this OOB now, with predictable results), and that's going to lead to APIs/data types embedding this information, IMHO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Unfortunately, inefficiency scales really well. -- Kevin Lawton
Current thread:
- Re: Dan Kaminsky, (continued)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Dragos Ruiu (Aug 04)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Curtis Maurand (Aug 04)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 04)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 04)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Kevin Oberman (Aug 04)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 04)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Leo Bicknell (Aug 05)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Florian Weimer (Aug 05)
- DNS alternatives (was Re: Dan Kaminsky) Roland Dobbins (Aug 05)
- Re: DNS alternatives (was Re: Dan Kaminsky) Mark Andrews (Aug 05)
- Re: DNS alternatives (was Re: Dan Kaminsky) Roland Dobbins (Aug 05)
- RE: DNS alternatives (was Re: Dan Kaminsky) Erik Soosalu (Aug 05)
- Re: DNS alternatives (was Re: Dan Kaminsky) Roland Dobbins (Aug 05)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 04)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Leo Bicknell (Aug 05)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Jorge Amodio (Aug 05)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Phil Regnauld (Aug 05)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Chris Adams (Aug 05)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Jorge Amodio (Aug 05)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Jorge Amodio (Aug 05)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Marshall Eubanks (Aug 05)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Ben Scott (Aug 05)