nanog mailing list archives
Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509.
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:16:22 +0700
On Aug 25, 2009, at 1:03 AM, Holmes,David A wrote:
In my opinion the Sup32 platform has some limitations when the technology is considered for high data rate, deterministic carrier customer-facing scenarios
The hardware-based FPM is interesting. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Sorry, sometimes I mistake your existential crises for technical insights. -- xkcd #625
Current thread:
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509., (continued)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Roland Dobbins (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Jack Bates (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Roland Dobbins (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Roland Dobbins (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Sean Donelan (Aug 22)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 22)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 22)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Roland Dobbins (Aug 24)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 24)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Mike Bartz (Aug 25)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. David Hughes (Aug 26)