nanog mailing list archives
Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509.
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:39:50 +0700
On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:23 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
there are two things you care about: storm control and port security (mac address counting).
Chopping up the layer-2 broadcast domain for a given VLAN into smaller pieces via pVLANs can't hurt, either, as long as the hosts have no need to talk to one another - and it has other benefits, as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Sorry, sometimes I mistake your existential crises for technical insights. -- xkcd #625
Current thread:
- Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Peter George (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Roland Dobbins (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Jack Bates (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Roland Dobbins (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Roland Dobbins (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Sean Donelan (Aug 22)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 22)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 21)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Nick Hilliard (Aug 22)
- Re: Alternatives to storm-control on Cat 6509. Roland Dobbins (Aug 24)