Re: The Cidr Report

[Geoff Huston <gih () apnic net>]

On 01/08/2009, at 6:44 PM, Paul Rolland (ポール・ロラン) wrote:

> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:22:37 -0400
> "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 31, 2009, at 6:00 PM, cidr-report () potaroo net wrote:
> >
> > > Recent Table History
> > >       Date      Prefixes    CIDR Agg
> > >       24-07-09    298785      182835
> > >       25-07-09    299168      182751
> > >       26-07-09    298909      182973
> > >       27-07-09    299265      183099
> > >       28-07-09    299345      183207
> > >       29-07-09    299380      182987
> > >       30-07-09    299354      183395
> > >       31-07-09    299904      183680
> >
> > Only 94 prefixes short!
> You mean 96, or is 299998 important to you ? ;)
>
> > Any bets on whether next tomorrow is THREE HUNDRED (thousand) day?
> > Careful what you say, we actually dropped prefixes Wed -> Thurs this
> > week.
> Don't invite people to "leak", you can be sure one of them will try  
> to be
> the one who "helped" reach the 300K range :(

done! Right now its 300002 entries from this vantage point.

In amidst the teeming morass of updates of existing announced  
prefixes, sorting out the exact announcement of a new prefix that took  
the table over 300000 entries will take a little time to work out.


   Geoff