nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dan Kaminsky
From: Cord MacLeod <cordmacleod () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:07:03 -0700
Read my post one more time... The standards you described are what I described. No video, no audio = no speech = no slander. The article was written, hence libel.
On Aug 3, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 01:11:17PM -0700, Cord MacLeod wrote:I don't see a video attached or an audio recording. Thus no slander. Libel on the other hand is a different matter.You have those backwards. Slander is transitory (i.e. spoken) defamation, libel is written/recorded/etc non-transitory defamation.This seems like a group that could benefit from knowing those two words.:) -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/rasGPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
Current thread:
- Re: Dan Kaminsky andrew.wallace (Aug 01)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Cord MacLeod (Aug 01)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 03)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Cord MacLeod (Aug 03)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky andrew.wallace (Aug 03)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Dragos Ruiu (Aug 04)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 03)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Cord MacLeod (Aug 01)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Curtis Maurand (Aug 04)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 04)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 04)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Kevin Oberman (Aug 04)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 04)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Leo Bicknell (Aug 05)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Florian Weimer (Aug 05)
- DNS alternatives (was Re: Dan Kaminsky) Roland Dobbins (Aug 05)
- Re: Dan Kaminsky Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 04)