nanog mailing list archives
Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests
From: Jo Rhett <jrhett () netconsonance com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:17:09 -0700
On Apr 21, 2009, at 5:20 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
Then they come back with a request for IPs for SSL certificates, which is a valid technical justification. BTDT. People will find a way to do thestupid thing they want to do.
Most of the stupid people don't, actually. That's the funny thing that surprises me -- just how obviously lame the justifications are, and how they are unable even with direct statements about how to justify the IP space to do so. My god, it's really not hard to build a valid justification for more space than you need -- seriously. But these people just can't pull it off.
Likewise, every company with whom I've had to debate the topic has failed within 18 months, so the problem pervades the organization ;-)
-- Jo RhettNet Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness
Current thread:
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests, (continued)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 23)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 23)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Perry Lorier (Apr 24)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Kevin Oberman (Apr 24)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Randy Bush (Apr 24)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 30)
- RE: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Justin Horstman (Apr 30)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jon Lewis (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Matthew Palmer (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 23)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Kevin Oberman (Apr 24)