nanog mailing list archives
Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests
From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer () hezmatt org>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:20:37 +1000
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 02:51:11PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Apr 21, 2009, at 1:58 PM, David Hubbard wrote:Raising the price won't help; there's already a huge amount of wasted address space by web hosts selling IP addresses to customers who need them solely for 'seo purposes' ratherIt's a common request we see. We refuse it, and point them to the Google documentation that shows that unique IPs don't help or hurt their SEO standings.
Then they come back with a request for IPs for SSL certificates, which is a valid technical justification. BTDT. People will find a way to do the stupid thing they want to do. - Matt
Current thread:
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests, (continued)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Nathan Ward (Apr 22)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 23)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 23)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Perry Lorier (Apr 24)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Kevin Oberman (Apr 24)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Randy Bush (Apr 24)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 30)
- RE: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Justin Horstman (Apr 30)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jon Lewis (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Matthew Palmer (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Jo Rhett (Apr 23)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests Kevin Oberman (Apr 24)