nanog mailing list archives
Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"]
From: Chris Owen <owenc () hubris net>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:55:49 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Apr 21, 2009, at 4:42 PM, Shane Ronan wrote:
C) Are ARIN's books open for public inspection? If so, it might be interesting for the group to see where all our money is going, since it's obviously not going to outreach and solution planning. Perhaps it is being spent in a reasonable manner, and the fees are where they need to be to sustain the organizations reasonable operations, but perhaps not.
It is a little out of date and not terribly detailed but they did post the 2008 budget at:
https://www.arin.net/about_us/corp_docs/budget.htmlBudget is just over 13M. About 1/2 of that is salaries/benefits (maybe more if you add in 'legal fees').
A couple of interesting notes when looking at it: 12+M divided by the 3300 "members" is just shy of $4,000 per customer.Payroll is $5,707,134 for 47 full time employees. That is an average salary of $121,428 across all employees.
Internet Research and Support is $164,500 Travel (which includes travel for board members, etc) is $1,315,349. There is more detail but older data at: https://www.arin.net/about_us/corp_docs/annual/2007_audited_financials.pdf Chris - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Chris Owen - Garden City (620) 275-1900 - Lottery (noun): President - Wichita (316) 858-3000 - A stupidity tax Hubris Communications Inc www.hubris.net - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Public Key: http://home.hubris.net/owenc/pgpkey.txt Comment: Public Key ID: 0xB513D9DD iEYEARECAAYFAknuQOUACgkQElUlCLUT2d3YDACgswR2sqikAunbbgVdRKrlQBeE a1cAoJPkHf25ZKua73NVEWg0wz+ZYQLY =6Ceo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"], (continued)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Kevin Loch (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Brandon Galbraith (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Jo Rhett (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Mark Newton (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Michael Dillon (Apr 24)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Brett Frankenberger (Apr 25)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Martin Hannigan (Apr 25)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Chris Owen (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Owen DeLong (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Owen DeLong (Apr 21)
- Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Shane Ronan (Apr 21)
- NAT64/NAT-PT update in IETF, was: Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 22)
- Re: NAT64/NAT-PT update in IETF, was: Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Jack Bates (Apr 22)
- Re: NAT64/NAT-PT update in IETF, was: Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 22)
- Re: NAT64/NAT-PT update in IETF, was: Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Ren Provo (Apr 22)
- Re: NAT64/NAT-PT update in IETF, was: Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Jack Bates (Apr 22)
- Re: NAT64/NAT-PT update in IETF, was: Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 23)
- Re: NAT64/NAT-PT update in IETF, was: Re: Important New Requirement for IPv4 Requests [re "impacting revenue"] Nathan Ward (Apr 23)