nanog mailing list archives

Re: IXP


From: Jeff Young <young () jsyoung net>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 09:39:49 -0400

Yeah,

You could count packets or you could forward them not both.
ACLs could crash everything.  Retrieving the config via SNMP
would crash a router.

I gotta get back into an ISP and get a new set of stories to tell.

jy

On Apr 18, 2009, at 10:29 PM, Deepak Jain wrote:

Remember when you didn't want to put in ACLs because you'd blow out the cpu on the router/card?

Ahhhhh... That made networking fun!

Deepak

----- Original Message -----
From: Jeff Young <young () jsyoung net>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Cc: Paul Vixie <vixie () isc org>; nanog () merit edu <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Sat Apr 18 20:45:48 2009
Subject: Re: IXP

Best solution I ever saw to an 'unintended' third-party
peering was devised by a pretty brilliant guy (who can
pipe up if he's listening).  When he discovered traffic
loads coming from non-peers he'd drop in an ACL that
blocked everything except ICMP - then tell the NOC to
route the call to his desk with the third party finally gave
up troubleshooting and called in...

fun memories of the NAPs...

jy


On Apr 18, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:

On 18/04/2009 01:08, Paul Vixie wrote:
i've spent more than several late nights and long weekends dealing
with
the problems of shared multiaccess IXP networks.  broadcast storms,
poisoned ARP, pointing default, unintended third party BGP,
unintended
spanning tree, semitranslucent loops, unauthorized IXP LAN
extension...
all to watch the largest flows move off to PNI as soon as somebody's
port was getting full.





Current thread: