nanog mailing list archives

Re: IXP

From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:17:11 -0400

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:58:24 +0000
bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:

      i make the claim that simple, clean design and execution is
best. even the security goofs will agree.

"Even"?  *Especially* -- or they're not competent at doing security.

But I hadn't even thought about DELNIs in years.


                --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb

Current thread:

Re: IXP, (continued)
- - - Re: IXP Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 17)
    - Re: IXP Daniel Roesen (Apr 17)
    - Re: IXP Randy Bush (Apr 17)
    - Re: IXP Matthew Moyle-Croft (Apr 17)
    - RE: IXP Deepak Jain (Apr 17)
    - Re: IXP Stephen Stuart (Apr 17)
    - Re: IXP Paul Vixie (Apr 18)
    - Re: IXP bmanning (Apr 18)
    - Re: IXP Paul Vixie (Apr 18)
    - Re: IXP bmanning (Apr 18)
    - Re: IXP Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 18)
    - Re: IXP Paul Vixie (Apr 18)
    - Re: IXP bmanning (Apr 18)
    - Re: IXP Jack Bates (Apr 18)
    - Re: IXP Dale Carstensen (Apr 18)
    - Re: IXP Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 18)
    - Re: IXP Paul Ferguson (Apr 18)
    - Re: IXP Roland Dobbins (Apr 18)
    - Re: IXP Sean Donelan (Apr 19)
    - Re: IXP Stephen Stuart (Apr 18)
    - Re: IXP Bill Woodcock (Apr 18)

(Thread continues...)