nanog mailing list archives
Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?]
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner () nic-naa net>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:29:07 -0400
Suresh,In a parallel universe we're considering profiles for "licit use" of some mechanism. One element of a multi-part test to distinguish "licit" from "illicit" was the presence or absence of known signatures for malware. After some thought it was understood that this test was equivalent to the node subject to the test being "cleaner" than the average for network attached consumer devices, and therefore not realistic.
Cheers, Eric Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
There's this concept known as "dual criminality" in such situations, when you're looking at international prosecutions (or whatever). So, while lesé majesté - insult to the king - is a crime in thailand (liable to get you lynched before you get prosecuted, at that) that doesnt mean the thai authorities can do much about youtube videos .. On the other hand, child pornography, malware, illegal sale of prescription narcotics etc are generally criminal acts around the world. regards srs On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Steven M. Bellovin <smb () cs columbia edu> wrote:I mostly agree with you -- but I get very worried about who defines "scum". Consider the following cases, which I will assert are not very far-fetched: (a) China labels Falun Gong as "scum" and demands that international ISPs not carry it if they want to do business in China
Current thread:
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] Paul Ferguson (Sep 01)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 01)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] bmanning (Sep 01)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage Florian Weimer (Sep 01)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Sep 01)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 01)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 01)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Sep 01)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 01)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 02)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] Eric Brunner-Williams (Sep 02)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 02)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] bmanning (Sep 01)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 01)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] Jay R. Ashworth (Sep 04)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage [Was: RE: Washington Post: Atrivo/Intercag e, w hy are we peering with the American RBN?] bmanning (Sep 03)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage Adrian Chadd (Sep 01)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage Gadi Evron (Sep 01)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage William Waites (Sep 01)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage Gadi Evron (Sep 01)
- Re: GLBX De-Peers Intercage William Waites (Sep 01)