nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S.
From: Matthew Moyle-Croft <mmc () internode com au>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:22:56 +0930
I suspect so - especially with CDN/Content providers pushing traffic out to the edge it means that we (the rest of the world) don't pay so much to haul it back from Northern America! (Thanks to those who are doing it - you know who you are and we love you for it!).Pardon my ignorance here, but isn't this more of a case of traffic growing outside of the USA which means that traffic within the USA represents a smaller share of the total internet traffic ?
Japan has 80% of it's internet traffic as domestic, as do a lot of Asian countries. As China, Korea and others grow their domestic volumes the %age coming from the USA is a lot less.
Most Asian providers (at least Northern Asia) use USA, Atlantic path to get to Europe. The capacity going Westt isn't that high in comparision, so the extra latency hit is well offset by the much reduced cost. My point in my first post is that this is changing rapidly as people (eg Reliance/Flag) are building more capacity West to Europe plus the Trans-Russian terrestrial (eg. TEA) are going for fast (and expensive from my understanding).Did western europe ever really have a primary route via the USA to reach asia ? (I realise that during the cable cuts in middle east last year, traffic might have been rerouted via USA but this would be a temporary situation).
For instance, out of Australia we have a single, old cable going West out of Perth to Singapore (SEA-ME-WE3) which allows only low speed circuits, but we've got almost 4 (as of next year) cables going North and East out of Sydney. So most Europe traffic to/from Australia is via the USA.
MMC -- Matthew Moyle-Croft - Internode/Agile - Networks Level 4, 150 Grenfell Street, Adelaide, SA 5000 Australia Email: mmc () internode com au Web: http://www.on.net Direct: +61-8-8228-2909 Mobile: +61-419-900-366 Reception: +61-8-8228-2999 Fax: +61-8-8235-6909
Current thread:
- Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Hank Nussbacher (Sep 13)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Jamie A Lawrence (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Jean-François Mezei (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Murtaza (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Murtaza (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Jim Mercer (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Alexander Harrowell (Sep 15)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Jim Mercer (Sep 15)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Joe Abley (Sep 15)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Jean-François Mezei (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Mark Prior (Sep 16)