nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S.
From: Matthew Moyle-Croft <mmc () internode com au>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:56:01 +0930
Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
Just to ensure no confusion - this was just about redundancy and diversity to ensure that not all your circuits go through OW, which is a common US West Coast issue.I don't think any of this will be because of sinister reasons, just for good engineering reasons and probably just to guarantee, without a doubt, that your circuit does NOT go through One Wilshire!
MMC
Current thread:
- Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Hank Nussbacher (Sep 13)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Jamie A Lawrence (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Jean-François Mezei (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Murtaza (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Murtaza (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Jim Mercer (Sep 14)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Alexander Harrowell (Sep 15)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Jim Mercer (Sep 15)
- Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S. Matthew Moyle-Croft (Sep 14)