nanog mailing list archives
Re: UDRP and ICANN / Input Requested
From: Ernie Rubi <ernesto () cs fiu edu>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:41:31 -0400
Off list is fine...this is precisely why I chose to write about it. On Oct 22, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
Fire, meet gasoline. >;-) If allowed to ignite, this will be an explosive discussion.scott --- ernesto () cs fiu edu wrote: From: Ernie Rubi <ernesto () cs fiu edu> So I'm a network engineer and a law student and have decided to write a short note for one of our International Law classes based on UDRP and ICANN issues. I'd like to request input from the community as to what they see as the advantages and disadvantages for the UDRP process the way ICANN has it structured now. Any comments on how to improve the system are greatly appreciated. You can contact post to the list or contact me off list, either way my information is below.
Current thread:
- UDRP and ICANN / Input Requested Ernie Rubi (Oct 22)
- Re: UDRP and ICANN / Input Requested Martin Hannigan (Oct 23)
- Re: UDRP and ICANN / Input Requested Eric Brunner-Williams (Oct 23)
- Re: UDRP and ICANN / Input Requested Eric Brunner-Williams (Oct 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: UDRP and ICANN / Input Requested Scott Weeks (Oct 22)
- Re: UDRP and ICANN / Input Requested Ernie Rubi (Oct 22)