nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts
From: "Charles Gucker" <cgucker () onesc net>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 08:58:46 -0400
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:35 AM, Paul Wall <pauldotwall () gmail com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:26 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net> wrote:1. Neither Sprint nor Cogent have transit Both Sprint & Cogent are transit-free networks. (Notice how I carefully avoided saying "tier one"?)How do you explain Cogent's arrangement with NTT (AS 2914)? If it's not transit, what is it?
So you are asking to have what was Cogent's arrangement with NTT? That's like asking what was AOL's relationship with Level(3) when they had their peering spat with Sprint. Just because a relationship existed in the past does not mean the same relationship exists today. Accept the fact that both providers are transit free and move forward.
Does Akamai have peering arrangements with Cogent directly?
Akamai are self declared peering sluts. So, yes, they have direct peering arrangements with Cogent. charles
Current thread:
- Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 02)
- Re: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts Paul Wall (Nov 02)
- Re: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts Charles Gucker (Nov 03)
- Re: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts Charles Gucker (Nov 03)
- Re: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 03)
- Re: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts Nicolas Antoniello (Nov 03)
- Re: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts Jeff Aitken (Nov 03)
- Re: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts Charles Gucker (Nov 03)
- Re: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts Paul Wall (Nov 02)
- Re: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts Florian Weimer (Nov 03)
- Re: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 03)
- RE: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts David Schwartz (Nov 03)
- Re: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts Florian Weimer (Nov 03)
- Re: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 03)
- RE: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts michael.dillon (Nov 03)
- Re: Sprint v. Cogent, some clarity & facts Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 03)