nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 routing /48s


From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:10:52 -0500

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Christopher Morrow
<morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net> wrote:
    I wish them good luck in reaching the DNS root servers.
  They are in "critical infrastructure" space, which is a single /32 with

traceroute6 to the ISC's v6 allocation(s) for f-root ... (from inside
701) oh, not working...

oh hey! this is fixed now :) (Thanks anonymous 701 engineer in my AIM window!!)

traceroute6 to ipv6.google.com from inside 701, oh... not working either.


Oh, this is also fixed, I get there from virginia -> frankfurt ->
12702 -> someone -> ipv6.google.com! All in .. 225ms or so.

vzb's v6 table is far from complete :( which is pretty painful.


the current table seen on the v6 routeviews box (routeviews6 perhaps?) is:
1495 routes

GRH is too slow to get me an answer on what it thinks the v6 table
size should be :( Geoff says though:
1627 routes
(http://bgp.potaroo.net/v6/as2.0/index.html)

-chris


Current thread: