nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 routing /48s
From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:10:52 -0500
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net> wrote:I wish them good luck in reaching the DNS root servers. They are in "critical infrastructure" space, which is a single /32 withtraceroute6 to the ISC's v6 allocation(s) for f-root ... (from inside 701) oh, not working...
oh hey! this is fixed now :) (Thanks anonymous 701 engineer in my AIM window!!)
traceroute6 to ipv6.google.com from inside 701, oh... not working either.
Oh, this is also fixed, I get there from virginia -> frankfurt -> 12702 -> someone -> ipv6.google.com! All in .. 225ms or so.
vzb's v6 table is far from complete :( which is pretty painful.
the current table seen on the v6 routeviews box (routeviews6 perhaps?) is: 1495 routes GRH is too slow to get me an answer on what it thinks the v6 table size should be :( Geoff says though: 1627 routes (http://bgp.potaroo.net/v6/as2.0/index.html) -chris
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Mark Andrews (Nov 25)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Florian Weimer (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Leo Bicknell (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jeroen Massar (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Pekka Savola (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Geoff Huston (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Antonio Querubin (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Paul Timmins (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Antonio Querubin (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Paul Timmins (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Christopher Morrow (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Kevin Loch (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Nathan Ward (Nov 19)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jack Bates (Nov 19)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Michael Sinatra (Nov 19)
- RE: IPv6 routing /48s TJ (Nov 19)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jack Bates (Nov 19)
- RE: IPv6 routing /48s TJ (Nov 19)