nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 routing /48s
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:38:45 +0100
Robert.E.VanOrmer () frb gov wrote:
Are there any parties out there routing /48 IPv6 networks globally? I ran into a supposed Catch-22 with Verizon and IPv6 address space and was looking for clarification.
Let them signup to GRH (http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/) then it will be very easy to see which chunks of the IPv6 routing table they are not seeing. A /48 is perfectly fine. Greets, Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Leo Bicknell (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jeroen Massar (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Pekka Savola (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Geoff Huston (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Antonio Querubin (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Paul Timmins (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Antonio Querubin (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Paul Timmins (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Christopher Morrow (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Kevin Loch (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Nathan Ward (Nov 19)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jack Bates (Nov 19)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Michael Sinatra (Nov 19)
- RE: IPv6 routing /48s TJ (Nov 19)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jack Bates (Nov 19)
- RE: IPv6 routing /48s TJ (Nov 19)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Christopher Morrow (Nov 19)
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jack Bates (Nov 19)