nanog mailing list archives
Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision
From: Andree Toonk <andree+nanog () toonk nl>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:31:17 +0100
Hi all, .-- My secret spy satellite informs me that at Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Todd Underwood wrote:
that's why i recommend that prefix hijacking detection systems do thresholding of peers to prevent a single, rogue, unrepresentative peer from reporting a hijacking when none is really happening. others may have a different approach, but without thresholding prefix alert systems can be noisy and more trouble than they are worth.
For those who like to use a peer threshold, BGPmon.net now has minimum peer threshold support. For more information see: http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=88 Cheers, Andree
Current thread:
- Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Scott Weeks (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Hank Nussbacher (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Todd Underwood (Nov 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Scott Weeks (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Alexander Harrowell (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Todd Underwood (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Jack Bates (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Danny McPherson (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Andree Toonk (Nov 17)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Todd Underwood (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Alexander Harrowell (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Martin List-Petersen (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Mohit Lad (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Josh Karlin (Nov 13)
- Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision Hank Nussbacher (Nov 13)