nanog mailing list archives
Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 03:47:49 +0200
found an related article about the power consumtion saving in ip6.
no, you found an article about bad nat design in a market lacking the ability to stanardize on a clean one. if you look, you can also find statements by the same folk explaining how ipv6 will help prevent car accidents involving falling rocks. yes, i am serious. note that i work very hard on ipv6 deployment. i just don't encourage or support marketing insanity. randy _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list NANOG () nanog org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
Current thread:
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Marc Manthey (May 04)
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Adrian Chadd (May 04)
- [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 05)
- Message not available
- Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 05)
- Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Niels Bakker (May 05)
- [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 05)
- Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Mike Fedyk (May 05)
- Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 05)
- Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Nathan Ward (May 05)
- Re: [NANOG] Larger packets to save power, was: Re: would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Adrian Chadd (May 05)
- Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ? Adrian Chadd (May 04)