nanog mailing list archives

RE: amazonaws.com?

From: <michael.dillon () bt com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 20:55:48 +0100

I think the straightforward fix is for Amazon to put some 
practical mail guidelines together for their environment


Has anyone making these suggestions ever thought to look at the Amazon
Web Services agreement that governs these EC2 customers?

<http://www.amazon.com/AWS-License-home-page-Money/b/ref=sc_fe_c_0_20159
0011_13?ie=UTF8&node=3440661&no=201590011&me=A36L942TSJ2AJA>

--Michael Dillon

Current thread:

RE: [SPAM-HEADER] - Re: NANOG NYC Event - Email found in subject, (continued)
- - - RE: [SPAM-HEADER] - Re: NANOG NYC Event - Email found in subject Rod Beck (May 31)
    - Re: NANOG NYC Event J. Oquendo (May 31)
    - Re: NANOG NYC Event Scott Brim (May 31)
    - Re: NANOG NYC Event andrew young (May 31)
    - Re: NANOG NYC Event Scott Brim (May 31)
    - Re: amazonaws.com? Joe Loiacono (May 29)
    - Re: amazonaws.com? Al Iverson (May 29)
    - Re: amazonaws.com? Barry Shein (May 29)
    - Re: amazonaws.com? Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 29)
    - Re: amazonaws.com? Brandon Galbraith (May 28)
    - RE: amazonaws.com? michael.dillon (May 28)
    - Re: amazonaws.com? Jay R. Ashworth (May 28)
    - Re: amazonaws.com? Joe Abley (May 28)
    - Re: amazonaws.com? Martin Hannigan (May 28)