nanog mailing list archives
Re: amazonaws.com?
From: "Brandon Galbraith" <brandon.galbraith () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 12:18:57 -0500
On 5/28/08, Skywing <Skywing () valhallalegends com> wrote:
That's somewhat ironic of a sentiment you referred to there, given that the conception that one should have to hand over one's SSN for "verification" to anyone who asks for it is the kind of thing that many of these spammers/phishers thrive on in the first place... (I assume that you are not actually really advocating such a requirement for anyone wanting to run a mail server...) - S
Many, many years ago, when I was working someplace that was just starting to dabble in shared hosting, the company would require a faxed copy of a driver's license to enable some hosting features (shell off the top of my head). In today's world, this simply will not do (customer sentiment, liability for loss of that data you're storing, and so on). I think the straightforward fix is for Amazon to put some practical mail guidelines together for their environment (time-based volume limitations, Amazon-provided smarthosts, etc) with an exception process for those who need larger amounts of legitimate outbound mail. I guess legitimate is subjective though. *sigh* -brandon
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG NYC Event, (continued)
- Re: NANOG NYC Event Christopher Morrow (May 31)
- RE: [SPAM-HEADER] - Re: NANOG NYC Event - Email found in subject Rod Beck (May 31)
- Re: NANOG NYC Event J. Oquendo (May 31)
- Re: NANOG NYC Event Scott Brim (May 31)
- Re: NANOG NYC Event andrew young (May 31)
- Re: NANOG NYC Event Scott Brim (May 31)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Joe Loiacono (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Al Iverson (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Barry Shein (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Brandon Galbraith (May 28)
- RE: amazonaws.com? michael.dillon (May 28)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Jay R. Ashworth (May 28)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Joe Abley (May 28)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Martin Hannigan (May 28)