nanog mailing list archives
Re: [NANOG] Installation troubles with GlobalCrossing
From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 21:05:37 -0400
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Paul Wall <pauldotwall () gmail com> wrote:
5mb limit ingressing/traversing their backbone? Or 5mb limit to their router's control plane? Important to differentiate between the two. I'd call the former totally unacceptable, and actionable per SLA 'till resolved (besides, whoever got taken down by a multi-gigabit PING FLOOD?); the latter is
seen them.. they can be painful :( a former customer got some large/fragmented icmp flood during a may-day event as I recall.
a concerned provider appropriately covering their base (I'd police random ICMP to even less, say 128kb).
at 1mbps rate-limited customers complained that 'your link is dropping packets' (when they do a rapid-ping off their edge device with 4000 byte packets... which went over the 1mbps policer). There's certainly some limit to be used, somewhere between 128k -> 2-4mbps. Also, it highly depends on edge platform of course :( -Chris _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list NANOG () nanog org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
Current thread:
- [NANOG] Installation troubles with GlobalCrossing Erich Hohermuth (May 15)
- Re: [NANOG] Installation troubles with GlobalCrossing Eddy Martinez (May 15)
- Re: [NANOG] Installation troubles with GlobalCrossing Dave Siegel (May 16)
- Re: [NANOG] Installation troubles with GlobalCrossing Erich Hohermuth (May 19)
- Re: [NANOG] Installation troubles with GlobalCrossing Drew Weaver (May 19)
- Re: [NANOG] Installation troubles with GlobalCrossing Paul Wall (May 19)
- Re: [NANOG] Installation troubles with GlobalCrossing Christopher Morrow (May 19)
- Re: [NANOG] Installation troubles with GlobalCrossing Drew Weaver (May 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [NANOG] Installation troubles with GlobalCrossing Robert Bonomi (May 19)