nanog mailing list archives
Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?
From: Nathan Anderson/FSR <nathana () fsr com>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 11:50:34 -0700
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
No. This would add significant delay because you'd have to give the other side enough time to respond to the large packet (also sending a large packet on something like GPRS/EDGE is a waste of bandwidth and battery power) while if there is ICMP filtering, there won't be a response, which is exactly the reason why we're in this bind in the first place
I admit the idea needs tweaking (at best), and it was just a stray thought :-), but 1) even if there is ICMP filtering happening way at the other end, I (the TCP initiator) will still get a response from the router in the middle (RITM) that is reducing the total path MTU if I try to send a packet through it larger than the actual path MTU, and 2) if I don't get a response to my single large packet (either from a RITM or the other end) in a timely fashion (less than a second?), then the client/initiator may just assume that path MTU == local MTU and will set its MSS accordingly (which is no different than what is happening now), until it has a reason to think differently. Also, if there is already something in the local PMTU cache for a single host address, I'm not sure I follow why it would be a bad idea for the TCP initiator to consult that cache when preparing the SYN. Although, on second thought, I suppose it is possible (and, in more than a few cases, likely) that in instances of route path asymmetry, the PMTU of the path from the initiator to the server may be different than the PMTU of the path back from the server to the client. Hmmm. Okay, scratch that idea then. :-P -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nathana () fsr com _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list NANOG () nanog org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
Current thread:
- [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? Nathan Anderson/FSR (May 06)
- Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? (working with Microsoft on issues) Janet Sullivan (May 08)
- Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? (working with Microsoft on issues) Niels Bakker (May 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? Brandon Butterworth (May 06)
- Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 06)
- Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? Nathan Anderson/FSR (May 06)
- Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? Nathan Anderson/FSR (May 06)
- Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 06)
- Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? Nathan Anderson/FSR (May 07)
- Message not available
- Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? Nathan Anderson/FSR (May 07)
- Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? Tomas L. Byrnes (May 07)
- Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? Nathan Anderson/FSR (May 07)
- Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? Matthew Petach (May 12)
- Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 06)
- Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? (working with Microsoft on issues) Janet Sullivan (May 08)
- Message not available
- Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 06)
- Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? Bjørn Mork (May 07)
- Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? Tomas L. Byrnes (May 06)
- Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole? Marshall Eubanks (May 06)