nanog mailing list archives
Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs)
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () baylink com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:06:40 -0400
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 12:49:35PM -0500, Frank Bulk - iNAME wrote:
One way to provide protection is too allow those who have the domain portion of any domain.(com|net|org|...) to have first dibs for the domain of any new gTLD. i.e. if nanog.org, nanog.com, nanog.net, etc. would have first dibs on nanog.thisisgreatstuff. Or is that too simplistic and fraught with division?
Oh, ick. No, it's just dumb. Could someone, anyone, anywhere, point me to *any case law in any jurisdiction whatsoever* which tends even to *suggest* that the mere purchase and deployment of a domain name *in itself* in any way constitutes infringement upon the rights of some holder of a trademark to some component of that domain name? or else shut the hell up about it, already? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra () baylink com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274 Those who cast the vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything. -- (Joseph Stalin)
Current thread:
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs), (continued)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) David Conrad (Jun 28)
- RE: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) Frank Bulk - iNAME (Jun 28)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET (Jun 28)
- Re: the business model, was what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens John Levine (Jun 28)
- RE: the business model, was what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens Frank Bulk - iNAME (Jun 28)
- RE: the business model, was what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens John Levine (Jun 28)
- Re: the business model, was what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens Roland Perry (Jun 28)
- Re: the business model, was what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens Jean-François Mezei (Jun 28)
- Re: the business model, was what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jun 29)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) Roland Perry (Jun 28)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) Jay R. Ashworth (Jun 30)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) Eric Brunner-Williams (Jun 29)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 27)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) Jean-François Mezei (Jun 27)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) David Conrad (Jun 28)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) Scott Francis (Jun 27)
- RE: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora'sBox of new TLDs) Matthew Huff (Jun 27)