nanog mailing list archives
Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs)
From: Roland Perry <lists () internetpolicyagency com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 21:14:06 +0100
In article <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAKTyXRN5/+lGvU59a+P7CFMBAN6gY+ZG84BMpVQcAbDh1IQAA AATbSgAABAAAAAP+1+63SBGRYYQR0hFiqgsAQAAAAA=@iname.com>, Frank Bulk - iNAME <frnkblk () iname com> writes
One way to provide protection is too allow those who have the domain portion of any domain.(com|net|org|...) to have first dibs for the domain of any new gTLD. i.e. if nanog.org, nanog.com, nanog.net, etc. would have first dibs on nanog.thisisgreatstuff. Or is that too simplistic and fraught with division?
perry.com perry.net perry.org perry.eu (etc...) and one of mine: perry.co.uk All have different registrants.Now, what I did think this week in Paris, listening to all this stuff, was that maybe there could be one big race/auction for something like mytrademark.sunrise, and then all the sunrise periods of all the other new tlds should automatically import as a reserved name, all the mytrademarks (but if the registration wasn't taken up by the end of the sunrise period, it could be thrown back in the pot).
-- Roland Perry
Current thread:
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs), (continued)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) WWWhatsup (Jun 27)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) David Conrad (Jun 28)
- RE: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) Frank Bulk - iNAME (Jun 28)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET (Jun 28)
- Re: the business model, was what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens John Levine (Jun 28)
- RE: the business model, was what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens Frank Bulk - iNAME (Jun 28)
- RE: the business model, was what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens John Levine (Jun 28)
- Re: the business model, was what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens Roland Perry (Jun 28)
- Re: the business model, was what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens Jean-François Mezei (Jun 28)
- Re: the business model, was what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jun 29)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) Roland Perry (Jun 28)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) Jay R. Ashworth (Jun 30)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) Eric Brunner-Williams (Jun 29)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 27)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) Jean-François Mezei (Jun 27)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) David Conrad (Jun 28)
- Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs) Scott Francis (Jun 27)