nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header
From: Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:43:46 -0400
Quite a few times it has been mentioned to me that some peering agreements require support for the IPv4 source routing options. I was wondering whether this is still the case for some ISPs, or it is not the case anymore.
Before we decommissioned our last open peering fabric, source-routing was important to make sure your peer wasn't pointing default (or similar) to you. With the advent of private (and far more limited) bilateral peering as a preference to fabric based peering (at least among the ones who set peering policies globally) this has become
less of an issue. RFC 5095 aside. Deepak
Current thread:
- IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Fernando Gont (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Joe Abley (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Deepak Jain (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Fernando Gont (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Joe Abley (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Randy Bush (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Fernando Gont (Jun 29)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Fernando Gont (Jun 25)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Sam Stickland (Jun 30)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header John Osmon (Jun 30)
- Re: IPv4 source routing options and IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header Joel Jaeggli (Jun 25)