nanog mailing list archives

Re: EC2 and GAE means end of ip address reputation industry? (Re: Intrustion attempts from Amazon EC2 IPs)


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:55:03 -0400

On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:38:16 EDT, William Herrin said:

Concur. From an address-reputation perspective EC2 is no different
than, say, China. Connections from China start life much closer to my
filtering threshold that connections from Europe because a far lower
percentage of the connections from China are legitimate. EC2 will get
the same treatment. As that starts to impact Amazon's ability to
maintain and grow the service, they'll do something about it. Or let
it wither. Either way, address reputation solves my problem.

No, it only solves your problem *if* you can compute a trustable reputation for
each address.  For instance, "connections from China" loses if another /12
shows up in the routing table and isn't correctly tagged as "China".  And
this fails the other way too - I remember a *lot* of providers were blocking
a /8 or so because it was "China", and didn't know that a chunk of that /8
was in fact Australia.  Similarly, you lose if EC2 deploys another /16 and
you don't pick up on it.

There's a *reason* that Marcus Ranum listed "Trying to enumerate badness"
as one of the 6 stupidest ideas in computer security....

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: